Skip to content
AI-generated answers are sourced from this archive. Verify against the linked source documents.

Effects on Air Quality, EIS Additional Information Response, Section 12 (BHP Billiton, December 1995)

This response to a BHP Review Panel request presents worst-case air quality dispersion modelling results for nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, and total suspended particulates at the Ekati Diamond Mine for years 2000 and 2006, demonstrating that predicted concentrations remain below or at Canadian Ambient Air Quality Objectives. The document details revised emission factors, meteorological data, mixing heights, and proposes monitoring programs including lichen biomonitoring to verify model predictions and detect impacts on local flora.

Date
Document type
Regulatory Filing
Parties
BHP Minerals, BHP Review Panel, Rescan Environmental Consultants, TRC Environmental Consultants, Caterpillar Inc., US EPA
Locations
Mackenzie Mining District, Northwest Territories, Koala site, Misery area, Panda pit, Leslie pit, Fox pit, Ajax Lake, Achilles Lake, Exeter Lake, Ursula Lake, Duchess Lake, Lac de Gras, Lac Sauvage, Paul Lake, Coppermine River
Parameters
air quality, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), total suspended particulate (TSP), nitrogen oxides (NOx), Canadian Ambient Air Quality Objectives (CAAQOs), mixing height, dispersion modelling, wind speed, wind direction, meteorological data, emissions, ambient concentrations, lichen monitoring, vegetation impacts, dust emissions, waste rock dumps
Pages
19

Original document

Loading the document…