Skip to content
AI-generated answers are sourced from this archive. Verify against the linked source documents.

Responses to Reviewers' Comments on the Draft Guidelines for Designing and Implementing Aquatic Effects Monitoring Programs (DIAND, June 2009)

This document presents written responses from INAC to comments received from 12 reviewers on draft Aquatic Effects Monitoring Program (AEMP) Guidelines for the Northwest Territories, addressing concerns about Traditional Knowledge integration, harmonization with EEM programs, regulatory framework clarity, and methodological approaches for pristine northern environments.

Date
Document type
Report
Parties
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Water Resources Division, D.D. MacDonald, MacDonald Environmental Sciences Ltd., B. Zajdlik, Zajdlik & Associates Inc., Golder Associates, Environmental Monitoring Advisory Board, GNWT Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Rio Tinto - Diavik Diamond Mines Inc., North Slave Métis Alliance, Independent Environmental Monitoring Agency, Land and Water Boards of the Mackenzie Valley, BHP Billiton, Sahtu Land and Water Board, Yellowknives Dene First Nation, Environment Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Locations
Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Nanaimo, Rockwood, Mackenzie Valley, Inuvialuit Settlement Region, Nunavut, Yukon, Mackenzie River, Colomac mine
Parameters
aquatic effects monitoring, water quality, environmental assessment, traditional knowledge, aquatic ecosystems, contaminants, stressors, fish, groundwater, surface water, chloride, effluent standards, water use, baseline studies, aquatic biota, cumulative effects, adaptive management, Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM), Data Quality Objectives (DQOs), problem formulation, human health
Pages
48

Original document

Loading the document…